Most of my colleagues and peers are now on the site, I see their citation updates and the metrics are improving. Don't install any apps or browser extensions like this, even if they. Publish with open access or a publisher where you can put the preprint on your webpage. IMHO, Google Scholar is a must, because the profile will make it easier to get updated on your other publications. So for me ResearchGate, in letting me follow researchers to see what theyve published recently, is a nice complement to journal Tables of Contents. With these developments in mind, it becomes even more important for us bibliometrics researchers to inform our stakeholders (such as funding agencies and university administrators) about the problems with individual metrics. Can I post my dissertation (currently only viewable within my institution) composed of journal papers on a personal website or Research Gate? Number search: viewed your public profile using Truecaller. What are some tools or methods I can purchase to trace a water leak? The JIF, however, was not introduced as a measure to evaluate individuals, but as a measure to guide libraries purchasing decisions of journals. recommendations. Launched in 2008, ResearchGate was one of the earlier academic social networks on the Web. Copy buddy_id and paste it into the search bar. Also we should be able to see the past summary always. Copyright 2023 www.techpout.com. It may come as no surprise that this strategy has since been adopted by many of ResearchGates competitors, including Academia.edu and Mendeley. I personally find one aspect of ResearchGate very useful, although I find that its benefit for me is only in small part due to any effect it has on my research visibility. Kraker, P., & Lex, E. (2015). The platform revolves around research papers, a question and answering system, and a job board. This is part of a series of pieces fromthe Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web workshop. Thanks to all authors for creating a page that has been read 2,475,402 times. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results. According to ResearchGate, the score includes the research outcomes that you share on the platform, your interactions with other members, and the reputation of your peers (i.e., it takes into consideration publications, questions, answers, followers). The platform revolves around research papers, a question and answering system, and a job board. Therefore, do not expect many high-quality interactions to happen. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. The names shown are fully random. But it also needs to be. Now, press the Ctrl+F and type InitialChatFriendsList to view . With the. It also has the number of account nominations remaining for the month. How do I cancel my Premium subscription? Unfortunately, that is not enough information to reproduce ones own score. Over the years, it has also been used for evaluating individual researchers. Why ResearchGate chooses to transform the impact points in this way is not clear. The US-based NISO Working Group on altmetrics has done a lot to help put altmetrics on a solid foundation, so I would just like to point out that one of their principles is also transparency and openness. We based our evaluation on well-established bibliometric guidelines for research metrics, and an empirical analysis of the score. Researchers are able to create a profile that showcases their publication record and their academic expertise. I don't think your question in this generality and broadness can be answered easily. They may have been too aggressive at boosting their user numbers quickly. By using our site, you agree to our. Lastly, we would advise you to not fall prey to third-party applications and browser extensions that let you see who viewed your Facebook profile. data, slides) is definitely a step into the right direction, and the idea of considering interactions when thinking about academic reputation has some merit. This makes it impossible to compare the RG Score over time, further limiting its usefulness. ResearchGate has only sent invitations from me to two people. If wikiHow has helped you, please consider a small contribution to support us in helping more readers like you. The overall idea is good, but they need to find a way to get quality contributions, not only quantity. To find out more about cookies and change your preferences, visit our, Series: Rapid Response Publishing in Covid Times, Subscribe to the Impact Blog via Email or RSS. With such high aims, Peter Kraker,Katy Jordan andElisabeth Lex take a closer look at the opaque metric. Get all latest content delivered straight to your inbox. This wikiHow article will teach you a few tricks for finding out who looks at your Facebook profile the most. Here is an extensive list of things a computer scientist thinks should be addressed http://ptbcs.blogspot.ca. As the JIF is based on the mean number of citations, a single paper with a high number of citations can therefore considerably skew the metric. Further muddying the water, the algorithm used to calculate the RG Score is changing over time. Goes over 7 key features that make ResearchGate a very useful tool for students and professors. As the JIF is based on the mean number of citations, a single paper with a high number of citations can therefore, In addition, the correlation between JIF and individual citations to articles, has been steadily decreasing since the 1990s. This is notable because Mendeley readership is widely recognized as the source with the best coverage among altmetrics sources, with plenty of academic research to back up that claim http://www.mendeley.com/groups/586171/altmetrics/ Weve even hosted Peter Kraker in the Mendeley offices on a fellowship! According to ResearchGate, the academic social networking site, their RG Score is a new way to measure your scientific reputation. Includes discussion boardsso can post questions,provide answersor simply join or track the conversation. We then expanded the sample to include examples from two further groups of academics: 30 academics who have a RG Score and multiple publications; and a further 30 were added who have a RG Score, multiple publications, and have posted at least one question and answer. The high number of messages prove to be very successful for ResearchGate: according to a study by Nature from 2014, ResearchGate is the most well known social network among researchers; 35 percent of surveyed researchers say that . Weapon damage assessment, or What hell have I unleashed? When I first joined the site several years ago, I was hugely disappointed and quickly realised that I would have to wait and see if it amounted to anything. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Love it, love it, the only thing I'd tweak would be to add a time / date stamp; please! In September, they introduced a new metric named Reads. Nidhal Kamel Taha El-Omari. 1 person found this helpful https://sites.google.com/view/privacypolicy-wprofile/home. It aims at allowing you to find articles that cite your work, without randomly distinguishing them in "valueable citations" or not. Also Read: How to Recover Permanently Deleted Messages On Facebook Messenger. I personally recommend having your own academic profile on the following social networks/tools: Twitter, A simple and fast way to share short messages, interesting pieces of info, etc. LinkedIn - More professional than academic. Other users are then able to follow these profiles and are notified of any updates. Is it possible for an academic to successfully claim their Google knowledge panel with an institution-hosted webpage and a Google Scholar account? that discourages the use of the Journal Impact Factor for the assessment of individual researchers has garnered more than 12,300 signees at the time of writing. In your account tab, scroll down and click on ' Switch to a Professional Account. Its not and we continue to work with the DOI Event Tracker (DET) team at Crossref to make sure this will never be the case. Was Galileo expecting to see so many stars? I think this is one of the points that makes people close a question. Now I pretty much get no email from them. Open Facebook. The World Islamic Science and Education University (WISE) The . Using the natural log of impact points will have the effect of diminishing returns for those with the highest impact points, so it could be speculated that the natural log is used to encourage less experienced academics. Multiple regression analysis indicated that RG Score was significantly predicted by a combination of number of views, natural logs of impact points, answers posted and number of publications. Is it really a good way of increasing the visibility of your publications and finding fellows with common research interests, or is it just a "waste of time"? (If the request doesn't look like spam, I usually send the requested paper by normal email if I can easily identify who asked). ResearchGate has received substantial financial backing from venture capitalists and Bill Gates, but it is not clear how the platform will generate revenue; the possibility of the score being linked to financial value warrants further exploration and critical assessment. You can deactivate notifications in settings->notifications. @EnthusiasticStudent OK, fair enough on the bumping. What is the best way to deprotonate a methyl group? (Android). The most plausible explanation is that ResearchGate adjusted the algorithm but without any hints as to why and how that has happened, it leaves the researcher guessing. One of the principles of the Leiden Manifesto states for example: Keep data collection and analytical processes open, transparent and simple, and it continues: Recent commercial entrants should be held to the same standards; no one should accept a black-box evaluation machine. Transparency is the only way measures can be put into context and the only way biases which are inherent in all socially created metrics can be uncovered. Furthermore, the JIF is only available for journals; therefore it cannot be used to evaluate fields that favor other forms of communication, such as computer science (conference papers) or the humanities (books). Make it available. The higher the RG Scores of those who interact with your research, the more your own score will increase. Finally, it should be pointed out that the RG Score is not the only bad metric out there. It should be noted that Peters behaviour on the platform has been relatively stable over this timeframe. Most of my peers that were on RG once, seem to have left. Honestly, in my opinion, there is one thing really important for the visibility of your research: If you make it easy for others to build upon your work, they are more likely to do so. This is more lively and it leads you on surprising paths, sometimes. Personal web page vs Academia.edu vs ResearchGate, Online venues that promote networking among scholars -- alternatives to Academia.edu and ResearchGate. Third, the info lists details of his/her skills and research experience. Add your publications by clicking 'add publications'. As a result, the JIF is rather problematic when evaluating journals; when it comes to single contributions it is even more questionable. If someone pops up on Facebook as "someone you might know," does that mean the person has recently viewed my profile? Over the years, it has also been used for evaluating individual researchers. ResearchGate seems to have reacted to the criticisms surrounding the RG Score. I have one of those half-dead profiles as many colleagues actually (still?) If you received a notification saying that "someone has viewed your profile", it means that someone has searched for you on Truecaller, either using your number or your name. Now, go to Profile visits. :-). It lures one in with an appeal to recognition of other authors who are friends or co-authors. Thanks for calling attention to this important issue. Can someone know if I view their Facebook profile a lot? How this app is fooling everyone. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.643PMC6466500/, Kraker, P., & Lex, E. (2015). Citations cannot be the main factor for evaluating a researchers work. Other users are then able to follow these profiles and are notified of any updates. This is exemplified by, in ResearchGates own question and answering system pertaining to the exact calculation of the RG Score. There is a prevalent view in the bibliometrics community that transparency and openness are important features of any metric. He has not removed pieces of research from the platform or unfollowed other researchers. We use cookies to make wikiHow great. A few people who are close to my field have written me due in part or in full to noticing me on RG. {"smallUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikihow.com\/images\/thumb\/a\/ab\/See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg\/v4-460px-See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg","bigUrl":"\/images\/thumb\/a\/ab\/See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg\/aid2904241-v4-728px-See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg","smallWidth":460,"smallHeight":345,"bigWidth":728,"bigHeight":546,"licensing":"